|
Subscribe
Recommend
|
|
|
|
|
|
A set of four Sanyo Eneloop AA cells in their reusable storage pack.
|
Review: Testing Sanyo's Eneloop Low Self-Discharge Rechargeable Battery
Late in 2006, I found out about Sanyo's new Eneloop Nickel Metal Hydride (NiMH)
rechargeable batteries, available in AA and AAA cell sizes. Unlike regular
NiMH offerings from other vendors (e.g. Duracell, Energizer, Gold Peak), Sanyo
claimed the following benefits for their Eneloops:
-
Very low self-discharge rate, meaning one can charge them any time, store
them until needed, and then use them.
-
Because of the previous characteristic, Sanyo sells them pre-charged, so
one doesn't have to charge them before their first use.
-
Lower internal resistance, meaning higher voltage reaching equipment that
uses high currents (such as digital cameras).
One apparent disadvantage of the Eneloops over normal NiMH cells is lower
capacity. For the AA size, Sanyo claims a capacity of 2000mAh. Normal NiMH AAs
are available with capacities of up to 2700mAh nowadays, but when you consider
self-discharge rate, such NiMH cells stored for about 30 days will drop to
2000mAh.
As an avid
radio controlled (R/C) model airplane
enthusiast, I've been using rechargeable batteries for a long time. My radio
equipment uses AA sized cells and my planes are powered by high-discharge Sub-C
sized cells. In the R/C field, Sanyo has a long history of reliable and
powerful cells, first Nickel Cadmium (NiCd) and more recently NiMH, so I was
confident that their new Eneloop cells would be every bit as good as they
claimed. I immediately went to the nearest Circuit City store (called The
Source here in Canada) and purchased a 4-pack of AA cells. They are also
available in
a kit with 8 AA and 4 AAA with a charger
through Amazon.
[August 2008 Update:
The Source no longer carries Eneloops in Canada. However, they are now
available on-line at
BatteryBuyer.ca.]
Out-of-the-box Capacity
Sanyo claims a low self-discharge rate of about 15% per year (compared with
about 1% per day for regular NiMH offerings). Because of this, they can
pre-charge them before packaging them up and expect them to still be close to
fully charged by the time you buy them. This means you can buy a pack because
you need batteries now, use them, and then recharge them hundreds of
times.
The first thing I did after I purchased my Eneloops was to fully discharge them
in order to measure their capacity. I have a home-made
computer-controlled battery charger/discharger/tester that I've used on my
R/C batteries for years, so I used that to perform the tests. I chose a
discharge rate of 1.2 Amps (1200mA), with the following results:
| Measurement | Four Cells | One Cell |
| Measured Capacity @ 1.2 A | 1367 mAh |
| Total Energy @ 1.2 A | 6090 mWh | 1523 mWh |
| Average Voltage Under Load | 4.45 V | 1.11 V |
| Internal DC Resistance | 0.389 Ω | 0.097 Ω |
| |
Characteristics of a 4-pack of AA Eneloop cells
discharged at 1.2A, fresh out of the package.
|
The discharge current that I chose is higher than that used by Sanyo to rate
the capacity. Manufacturers typically use a discharge current of C/5, which
means the battery capacity divided by 5. For a 2000mAh battery, this would be
400mA, or 0.4A. Discharging at higher current typically results in a lower
capacity. However, I've done all my tests at 1.2A, so the comparisons
will be valid. Here's a graph of that first discharge:
|
|
Discharge curve of a 4-pack of AA Eneloop cells at 1.2A, fresh out of the package.
|
The average voltage under load is only 1.11V per cell, but that's not
surprising since voltage always drops somewhat later in the discharge cycle.
Since the cells started out already partially discharged, the average voltage
will be lower than the expected 1.2V of a typical NiMH cell. Furthermore, the
relatively high current that I used also significantly reduces the voltage. At
a more typical 400mA load, the average voltage would have been 1.19V (computed
using the measured internal resistance).
Available Capacity
After completing the discharge tests, I cycled the 4-pack five times. Cycling
is the process of repeatedly fully discharging and fully recharging, the
purpose being to exercise the battery. Most batteries require three to five
cycles before they reach their rated capacity. After five such cycles, the
following results were observed:
| Measurement | Four Cells | One Cell |
| Measured Capacity @ 1.2 A | 1848 mAh |
| Total Energy @ 1.2 A | 8644 mWh | 2161 mWh |
| Average Voltage Under Load | 4.68 V | 1.17 V |
| Internal DC Resistance | 0.384 Ω | 0.096 Ω |
| |
Characteristics of a 4-pack of AA Eneloop cells
after five discharge/charge cycles at 1.2A.
|
With a capacity (at 1.2A) of 1848mAh, the out-of-the-box capacity of 1367mAh
represents an initial charge of 74%. This pack of AAs was manufactured in June
of 2006, so they were six months old at the time I tested them. This is worse
than Sanyo's claim of 90% capacity after six months, but far better than a
normal NiMH battery, which would be down to about 16% capacity after that much
time. Here's the graph of the fifth discharge/charge cycle:
|
|
Fifth discharge/charge cycle of a 4-pack of AA Eneloop cells at 1.2A.
|
Once again the average voltage is less than the typical 1.2V per cell, but this
is due to the high load. With a 400mA load, the voltage would have been 1.25V
per cell.
[May 2007 Update: According to Sanyo,
Eneloops are only charged to about 75% capacity at the factory. This implies
that the battery lost almost no capacity between the factory and my
workshop.]
[September 2007 Update: I've just purchased an 8-pack of Eneloops
that were manufactured in October 2006. I performed the same initial-discharge
test on these and found them to have a capacity of 1316 mAh, which works out
to about 72%. The fact that six month old Eneloops come out of the package with
74% capacity and eleven month old ones with 72% suggests that they discharge
extremely slowly from the 75% initial charge.]
Self Discharge
Based on the results so far, I was sufficiently pleased with the Eneloops to
start using them in my Garmin GPSMAP 60C, which sits for a week or two at a
time in my flight bag, and then has to work for several hours when I take it
flying. I also bought six more to use in my
Nikon Coolpix 8700
camera (with the optional MB-E5700 battery pack designed to accept 6 NiMH
cells).
However, I wasn't done testing yet, so on January 14, I cycled the original
4-pack a few times to make sure it was fully charged, after which it had the
following characteristics:
| Measurement | Four Cells | One Cell |
| Measured Capacity @ 1.2 A | 1799 mAh |
| Total Energy @ 1.2 A | 8413 mWh | 2103 mWh |
| Average Voltage Under Load | 4.68 V | 1.17 V |
| Internal DC Resistance | 0.382 Ω | 0.096 Ω |
| |
Characteristics of a 4-pack of AA Eneloop cells
after a few more discharge/charge cycles, prior
to a seven week rest.
|
I then set it aside in my workshop (which is usually at about 18°C or
64°F). Seven weeks later, I performed a discharge test and achieved the
following results:
| Measurement | Four Cells | One Cell |
| Measured Capacity @ 1.2 A | 1636 mAh |
| Total Energy @ 1.2 A | 7252 mWh | 1813 mWh |
| Average Voltage Under Load | 4.43 V | 1.11 V |
| Internal DC Resistance | 0.470 Ω | 0.118 Ω |
| |
Characteristics of a 4-pack of AA Eneloop cells
after a seven week rest.
|
A capacity of 1636mAh is 90.9% of the 1799mAh it had when I set it aside. In
other words, it lost 9.1% of its charge over the course of 7 weeks. This
translates to the following results for differing time periods:
| Time Period | Charge Retention | Charge Loss |
| Day | 99.8% | 0.2% |
| Week | 98.7% | 1.3% |
| Month | 94.3% | 5.7% |
| Six Months | 70.2% | 29.8% |
| Year | 49.3% | 50.7% |
| |
Charge retention and loss characteristics of
AA Eneloop cells for various periods of time.
(Six month and one year values are predictions.)
|
These results are not as good as Sanyo's claim of 90% charge retention over
the course of six months, but still far better than what one would expect of
ordinary NiMH cells. Even after one year, the Eneloops would still have half
their rated capacity, whereas a regular NiMH battery would be virtually dead.
Notice that the predicted six-month capacity matches very closely the capacity
I measured on the six month old just-purchased cells.
Sanyo doesn't specify what the optimal storage conditions are for fully charged
cells. Perhaps they'd do better stored at warmer temperatures, or maybe storing
them in the freezer would be best. Additional testing is required to determine
this.
[May 2007 Update: Sanyo has told me that
the rate at which the battery discharges decreases over time. Thus, my
extrapolation from the seven week discharge is overly pessimistic. They are
also best stored at cool temperatures, as low as -20°C (-4°F).]
[September 2007 Update: It appears that Sanyo is correct about my
extrapolation being pessimistic. My recently purchased eleven month old
Eneloops had almost the same initial capacity (72%) as six month old ones
(74%), suggesting that the self-discharge curve does flatten out at about the
75% mark.]
Here's the graph of the discharge and charge after seven weeks:
|
|
Discharge/charge cycle of a 4-pack of AA Eneloop cells at 1.2A after seven weeks of rest.
|
There's an interesting observation here. Notice that the voltage initially
drops quite low, to about 4.48V, and then rises a bit to about 4.52V. This is
likely caused by the initial low temperature of the cells. After about 30
minutes of discharging, they would have warmed up (from internal I2R
losses).
|
|
|
|
Eneloop cells can be charged in any standard Nickel Metal Hydride (NiMH) charger, including this do-it-yourself USB-powered one.
|
This also accounts for the relatively high internal resistance reported by my
battery analyzer. The analyzer measures the resistance either immediately, or
when the battery first drops below 1.2V per cell. If it had waited until the
cells "woke up", it would probably have seen better results.
Charging
Eneloop cells can be charged in any normal slow or fast charger designed for
regular NiMH cells. Personally, I would steer away from the super-fast chargers
that work in under an hour (some as fast as 15 minutes). Although we use such
chargers for R/C model power batteries, the cells in those batteries have a
very low internal resistance (typically about 0.004Ω per cell) and can
handle the high charge rates. With the approximately 0.1Ω resistance of
the Eneloops, an 8A charge rate (which is needed to produce a 15 minute charge)
would cause about 6.4W of heat to be generated in each cell, which will make
them very hot.
|
|
|
Unlike traditional NiMH AAs, Eneloops are a good choice for remote controls.
|
Like any rechargeable battery, Eneloops should not be left connected to a low
current "wall-wart" type slow charger indefinitely. Fortunately, the main
reason for doing this has been to ensure there are always charged batteries on
hand. With the Eneloops' low self-discharge rate, this is not really
necessary.
Eneloops are probably best charged with a 1 to 5 hour quick charger (like this
do-it-yourself USB powered one) that
automatically turns off on charge completion, and then removed and stored until
needed. If left unused, they can be recharged every few months to top them off.
[May 2007 Update: Sanyo will be introducing their own USB powered
Eneloop charger on May 21.]
Applications
Traditionally, I've used rechargeable cells in equipment that gets used for a
short period and then sits around until its next use. I'd recharge the battery
just before using it again. For other battery powered devices, such as wall
clocks, flashlights, and TV remotes, disposable alkalines made more sense
because rechargeables would run down more quickly from self-discharge than due
to the power needed by the device.
|
|
|
|
Eneloops are also suitable for long-running devices like this battery operated clock.
|
With the Eneloops still maintaining about half their capacity after a year,
it's now feasible to use them in such long-term applications. When they do run
down, I can just insert freshly charged ones and recharge the old ones. This
has enormous potential environmental benefits, since it can virtually eliminate
the need for disposable batteries.
|
|
|
Because of their low internal resistance, Eneloops are also ideal for high-current devices. This is the battery pack for my Nikon Coolpix 8700 digital camera.
|
Like regular NiMH AA batteries, Eneloops are also a great choice for
high-current devices like digital cameras that like to eat batteries. I
recently purchased a Nikon MB-E5700 external battery pack for my Coolpix 8700
camera. This attaches to the bottom of the camera and holds six AA cells. I put
a freshly charged set of Eneloops in them before our trip to Florida. One and a
half months and 160 photos later, the camera's battery indicator is still
showing "full".
[May 2007 Update: I finally had to recharge the Eneloops after three
months and 320 pictures.]
At this point, Eneloop technology is still relatively new. It remains to be
seen how long they will last. Just because an Eneloop cell might last a year in
a clock before needing recharging, and it can be recharged hundreds of times,
doesn't mean it will last hundreds of years. All battery technologies wear out,
even when their full capabilities are not being used. However, these are
a form of NiMH technology, which is very reliable and stable. I have a 10 year
old NiMH battery that can still achieve about 85% of its original capacity, so
I have confidence in the Eneloops' longevity.
Where to Buy Them
Sanyo's Eneloop batteries are available from a number of North American
retailers including Circuit City, Fry's Electronics, and the Ritz Camera
Centers family of stores. They are also available on-line in the USA through
Amazon.com:
In Canada, Eneloops can be purchased on-line from BatteryBuyer.ca:
For purchase in Europe, please refer to the
Sanyo Component Europe web site.
|
A Response from SANYO
|
|
About a month after first posting this review, I received a very nice
e-mail from Mr. Taetow, Vice President General Affairs at SANYO
Component Europe GmbH, expressing appreciation for my independent
review and addressing a few points, which I've summarized below:
-
The Eneloop batteries are sold charged, but not necessarily
100% fully charged. In Europe we charge them about 75%. I am not
sure to which degree they are charged before being sold in
Canada. Thus it is rather vague to estimate the discharge rate
by calculating backwards to the production date. Also, the
storage conditions (transport, warehouse, shop, etc.) are
unknown (see point 3 below).
-
Several long term tests have shown that the self-discharge
rate decreases over time. This means that Eneloop batteries
discharge relatively fast at the beginning and relatively
slower the longer you store them. To get real (long-term) test
results, you have to store them and wait. An estimation of
long-term discharge rate by extrapolating short term storage
results is not correct and leads to rather poor results. This
may explain the differences you have seen.
-
Storage temperature is of high importance if you
measure self-discharge rate. Higher temperatures
substantially increase self-discharging. It is best to
store Eneloops as cool as possible to keep the charge in the
battery. As a rule-of-thumb, every 10°C increase in storage
temperature is equivalent to doubling the storage time. Some R/C
pilots in Europe put Eneloops in the freezer, with rather good
results.
In short, the Eneloops may be even better than my tests show. Without
more testing, I can't confirm this, but my results show they are
already far better than traditional NiMH
rechargeables.
Mr. Taetow also saw my home-made
USB Powered AA Charger (which can be
used for Eneloops) and informed me that Sanyo is introducing their
own USB powered Eneloop charger, scheduled for release on May 21, 2007.
|
|
May 2007: Comparison with Traditional NiMH Rechargeables
|
|
Over the course of the last seven weeks, I repeated the above
experiments with a set of 2500mAh NiMH cells of a well respected
brand. After an initial set of four cycles, these had the
following characteristics:
| Measurement | Four Cells | One Cell |
| Measured Capacity @ 1.2 A | 2172 mAh |
| Total Energy @ 1.2 A | 9745 mWh | 2436 mWh |
| Average Voltage Under Load | 4.49 V | 1.12 V |
| Internal DC Resistance | 0.430 Ω | 0.108 Ω |
| |
Characteristics of a 4-pack of AA traditional 2500mAh
NiMH cells after four discharge/charge cycles, prior
to a seven week rest.
|
Seven weeks later (less two days), I performed a discharge test and
achieved the following results:
| Measurement | Four Cells | One Cell |
| Measured Capacity @ 1.2 A | 1360 mAh |
| Total Energy @ 1.2 A | 5647 mWh | 1412 mWh |
| Average Voltage Under Load | 4.15 V | 1.04 V |
| Internal DC Resistance | 0.499 Ω | 0.125 Ω |
| |
Characteristics of a 4-pack of AA traditional 2500mAh
NiMH cells after a seven week rest.
|
This works out to a capacity retention of 62.6% (a loss of 37.4%) over
the course of 47 days, which translates to the following results for
differing time periods:
| Time Period | Charge Retention | Charge Loss |
| Day | 99.0% | 1.0% |
| Week | 93.3% | 6.7% |
| Month | 73.8% | 26.2% |
| Six Months | 16.2% | 83.8% |
| Year | 2.6% | 97.4% |
| |
Charge retention and loss characteristics of
traditional 2500mAh AA NiMH cells for various periods.
(Six month and one year values are predictions.)
|
Although these cells start out with about 20% more capacity than the
Eneloops, they lose their capacity more quickly. After only three
weeks of storage, the Eneloops have more capacity remaining. After
about 3½ months, the Eneloops will have twice the capacity of
the traditional cells.
|
|
After only three weeks of storage, traditional 2500mAh NiMH cells will have less capacity remaining than 2000mAh Eneloops.
|
[September 2007 Update: My recent experience purchasing
eleven month old Eneloops that had the same initial charge (72% of
rated capacity) as six month old ones (74%) suggests that the the
Eneloops' self-discharge curve flattens out. The above graph should
probably look approximately like this:
|
|
Revised graph based on experience with eleven month old Eneloops. Even better than previously thought!
|
]
|
Other Articles of Interest
If you found this article useful, you may also be interested in:
|
Buy Stefan a coffee!
If you've found this article
useful, consider
leaving a donation
to help support
stefanv.com
|
|
|
Disclaimer:
Although every effort has been made to ensure accuracy and
reliability, the information on this web page is presented without
warranty of any kind, and Stefan Vorkoetter assumes no liability for direct or
consequential damages caused by its use.
It is up to you, the reader, to determine the suitability of, and
assume responsibility for, the use of this information.
Copyright:
All materials on this web site, including the text, images, and HTML
mark-up, are Copyright © 2009 by Stefan Vorkoetter unless
otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Unauthorized duplication
prohibited. You may link to this site or pages within it, but
you may not link directly to images on this site, and you may
not copy any material from this site to another web site or
other publication without express written permission. You may make
copies for your own personal use.
|
|