Electronics
Reviews
Electronic
Projects
Electric
R/C Planes
General
Aviation
Hammond
Organs
Calculator
Collection
Slide Rule
Collection

Subscribe

  • Subscribe to stefanv.com feed
  • Subscribe to stefanv.com with MY AOL
  • Subscribe to stefanv.com with Bloglines
  • Subscribe to stefanv.com with Google
  • Subscribe to stefanv.com with My MSN
  • Subscribe to stefanv.com with NewsIsFree
  • Subscribe to stefanv.com with newsgator
  • Subscribe to stefanv.com with My Yahoo!
  • Recommend

  • Submit this article to del.icio.us
  • Submit this article to digg
  • Submit this article to StumbleUpon
  •    A set of four Sanyo Eneloop AA cells in their reusable storage pack.
    A set of four Sanyo Eneloop AA cells in their reusable storage pack.
    Review: Testing Sanyo's Eneloop Low Self-Discharge Rechargeable Battery

    Late in 2006, I found out about Sanyo's new Eneloop Nickel Metal Hydride (NiMH) rechargeable batteries, available in AA and AAA cell sizes. Unlike regular NiMH offerings from other vendors (e.g. Duracell, Energizer, Gold Peak), Sanyo claimed the following benefits for their Eneloops:

    • Very low self-discharge rate, meaning one can charge them any time, store them until needed, and then use them.
    • Because of the previous characteristic, Sanyo sells them pre-charged, so one doesn't have to charge them before their first use.
    • Lower internal resistance, meaning higher voltage reaching equipment that uses high currents (such as digital cameras).

    One apparent disadvantage of the Eneloops over normal NiMH cells is lower capacity. For the AA size, Sanyo claims a capacity of 2000mAh. Normal NiMH AAs are available with capacities of up to 2700mAh nowadays, but when you consider self-discharge rate, such NiMH cells stored for about 30 days will drop to 2000mAh.

    As an avid radio controlled (R/C) model airplane enthusiast, I've been using rechargeable batteries for a long time. My radio equipment uses AA sized cells and my planes are powered by high-discharge Sub-C sized cells. In the R/C field, Sanyo has a long history of reliable and powerful cells, first Nickel Cadmium (NiCd) and more recently NiMH, so I was confident that their new Eneloop cells would be every bit as good as they claimed. I immediately went to the nearest Circuit City store (called The Source here in Canada) and purchased a 4-pack of AA cells. They are also available in a kit with 8 AA and 4 AAA with a charger through Amazon.

    [August 2008 Update: The Source no longer carries Eneloops in Canada. However, they are now available on-line at BatteryBuyer.ca.]

    Out-of-the-box Capacity

    Sanyo claims a low self-discharge rate of about 15% per year (compared with about 1% per day for regular NiMH offerings). Because of this, they can pre-charge them before packaging them up and expect them to still be close to fully charged by the time you buy them. This means you can buy a pack because you need batteries now, use them, and then recharge them hundreds of times.

    The first thing I did after I purchased my Eneloops was to fully discharge them in order to measure their capacity. I have a home-made computer-controlled battery charger/discharger/tester that I've used on my R/C batteries for years, so I used that to perform the tests. I chose a discharge rate of 1.2 Amps (1200mA), with the following results:

    MeasurementFour CellsOne Cell
    Measured Capacity @ 1.2 A1367 mAh
    Total Energy @ 1.2 A6090 mWh1523 mWh
    Average Voltage Under Load4.45 V1.11 V
    Internal DC Resistance0.389 Ω0.097 Ω
    Characteristics of a 4-pack of AA Eneloop cells
    discharged at 1.2A, fresh out of the package.

    The discharge current that I chose is higher than that used by Sanyo to rate the capacity. Manufacturers typically use a discharge current of C/5, which means the battery capacity divided by 5. For a 2000mAh battery, this would be 400mA, or 0.4A. Discharging at higher current typically results in a lower capacity. However, I've done all my tests at 1.2A, so the comparisons will be valid. Here's a graph of that first discharge:

    Discharge curve of a 4-pack of AA Eneloop cells at 1.2A, fresh out of the package.
    Discharge curve of a 4-pack of AA Eneloop cells at 1.2A, fresh out of the package.

    The average voltage under load is only 1.11V per cell, but that's not surprising since voltage always drops somewhat later in the discharge cycle. Since the cells started out already partially discharged, the average voltage will be lower than the expected 1.2V of a typical NiMH cell. Furthermore, the relatively high current that I used also significantly reduces the voltage. At a more typical 400mA load, the average voltage would have been 1.19V (computed using the measured internal resistance).

    Available Capacity

    After completing the discharge tests, I cycled the 4-pack five times. Cycling is the process of repeatedly fully discharging and fully recharging, the purpose being to exercise the battery. Most batteries require three to five cycles before they reach their rated capacity. After five such cycles, the following results were observed:

    MeasurementFour CellsOne Cell
    Measured Capacity @ 1.2 A1848 mAh
    Total Energy @ 1.2 A8644 mWh2161 mWh
    Average Voltage Under Load4.68 V1.17 V
    Internal DC Resistance0.384 Ω0.096 Ω
    Characteristics of a 4-pack of AA Eneloop cells
    after five discharge/charge cycles at 1.2A.

    With a capacity (at 1.2A) of 1848mAh, the out-of-the-box capacity of 1367mAh represents an initial charge of 74%. This pack of AAs was manufactured in June of 2006, so they were six months old at the time I tested them. This is worse than Sanyo's claim of 90% capacity after six months, but far better than a normal NiMH battery, which would be down to about 16% capacity after that much time. Here's the graph of the fifth discharge/charge cycle:

    Fifth discharge/charge cycle of a 4-pack of AA Eneloop cells at 1.2A.
    Fifth discharge/charge cycle of a 4-pack of AA Eneloop cells at 1.2A.

    Once again the average voltage is less than the typical 1.2V per cell, but this is due to the high load. With a 400mA load, the voltage would have been 1.25V per cell.

    [May 2007 Update: According to Sanyo, Eneloops are only charged to about 75% capacity at the factory. This implies that the battery lost almost no capacity between the factory and my workshop.]

    [September 2007 Update: I've just purchased an 8-pack of Eneloops that were manufactured in October 2006. I performed the same initial-discharge test on these and found them to have a capacity of 1316 mAh, which works out to about 72%. The fact that six month old Eneloops come out of the package with 74% capacity and eleven month old ones with 72% suggests that they discharge extremely slowly from the 75% initial charge.]

    Self Discharge

    Based on the results so far, I was sufficiently pleased with the Eneloops to start using them in my Garmin GPSMAP 60C, which sits for a week or two at a time in my flight bag, and then has to work for several hours when I take it flying. I also bought six more to use in my Nikon Coolpix 8700 camera (with the optional MB-E5700 battery pack designed to accept 6 NiMH cells).

    However, I wasn't done testing yet, so on January 14, I cycled the original 4-pack a few times to make sure it was fully charged, after which it had the following characteristics:

    MeasurementFour CellsOne Cell
    Measured Capacity @ 1.2 A1799 mAh
    Total Energy @ 1.2 A8413 mWh2103 mWh
    Average Voltage Under Load4.68 V1.17 V
    Internal DC Resistance0.382 Ω0.096 Ω
    Characteristics of a 4-pack of AA Eneloop cells
    after a few more discharge/charge cycles, prior
    to a seven week rest.

    I then set it aside in my workshop (which is usually at about 18°C or 64°F). Seven weeks later, I performed a discharge test and achieved the following results:

    MeasurementFour CellsOne Cell
    Measured Capacity @ 1.2 A1636 mAh
    Total Energy @ 1.2 A7252 mWh1813 mWh
    Average Voltage Under Load4.43 V1.11 V
    Internal DC Resistance0.470 Ω0.118 Ω
    Characteristics of a 4-pack of AA Eneloop cells
    after a seven week rest.

    A capacity of 1636mAh is 90.9% of the 1799mAh it had when I set it aside. In other words, it lost 9.1% of its charge over the course of 7 weeks. This translates to the following results for differing time periods:

    Time PeriodCharge RetentionCharge Loss
    Day99.8%0.2%
    Week98.7%1.3%
    Month94.3%5.7%
    Six Months70.2%29.8%
    Year49.3%50.7%
    Charge retention and loss characteristics of
    AA Eneloop cells for various periods of time.
    (Six month and one year values are predictions.)

    These results are not as good as Sanyo's claim of 90% charge retention over the course of six months, but still far better than what one would expect of ordinary NiMH cells. Even after one year, the Eneloops would still have half their rated capacity, whereas a regular NiMH battery would be virtually dead. Notice that the predicted six-month capacity matches very closely the capacity I measured on the six month old just-purchased cells.

    Sanyo doesn't specify what the optimal storage conditions are for fully charged cells. Perhaps they'd do better stored at warmer temperatures, or maybe storing them in the freezer would be best. Additional testing is required to determine this.

    [May 2007 Update: Sanyo has told me that the rate at which the battery discharges decreases over time. Thus, my extrapolation from the seven week discharge is overly pessimistic. They are also best stored at cool temperatures, as low as -20°C (-4°F).]

    [September 2007 Update: It appears that Sanyo is correct about my extrapolation being pessimistic. My recently purchased eleven month old Eneloops had almost the same initial capacity (72%) as six month old ones (74%), suggesting that the self-discharge curve does flatten out at about the 75% mark.]

    Here's the graph of the discharge and charge after seven weeks:

    Discharge/charge cycle of a 4-pack of AA Eneloop cells at 1.2A after seven weeks of rest.
    Discharge/charge cycle of a 4-pack of AA Eneloop cells at 1.2A after seven weeks of rest.

    There's an interesting observation here. Notice that the voltage initially drops quite low, to about 4.48V, and then rises a bit to about 4.52V. This is likely caused by the initial low temperature of the cells. After about 30 minutes of discharging, they would have warmed up (from internal I2R losses).

       Eneloop cells can be charged in any standard Nickel Metal Hydride (NiMH) charger, including this do-it-yourself USB-powered one.
    Eneloop cells can be charged in any standard Nickel Metal Hydride (NiMH) charger, including this do-it-yourself USB-powered one.
    This also accounts for the relatively high internal resistance reported by my battery analyzer. The analyzer measures the resistance either immediately, or when the battery first drops below 1.2V per cell. If it had waited until the cells "woke up", it would probably have seen better results.

    Charging

    Eneloop cells can be charged in any normal slow or fast charger designed for regular NiMH cells. Personally, I would steer away from the super-fast chargers that work in under an hour (some as fast as 15 minutes). Although we use such chargers for R/C model power batteries, the cells in those batteries have a very low internal resistance (typically about 0.004Ω per cell) and can handle the high charge rates. With the approximately 0.1Ω resistance of the Eneloops, an 8A charge rate (which is needed to produce a 15 minute charge) would cause about 6.4W of heat to be generated in each cell, which will make them very hot.

    Unlike traditional NiMH AAs, Eneloops are a good choice for remote controls.   
    Unlike traditional NiMH AAs, Eneloops are a good choice for remote controls.
    Like any rechargeable battery, Eneloops should not be left connected to a low current "wall-wart" type slow charger indefinitely. Fortunately, the main reason for doing this has been to ensure there are always charged batteries on hand. With the Eneloops' low self-discharge rate, this is not really necessary.

    Eneloops are probably best charged with a 1 to 5 hour quick charger (like this do-it-yourself USB powered one) that automatically turns off on charge completion, and then removed and stored until needed. If left unused, they can be recharged every few months to top them off.

    [May 2007 Update: Sanyo will be introducing their own USB powered Eneloop charger on May 21.]

    Applications

    Traditionally, I've used rechargeable cells in equipment that gets used for a short period and then sits around until its next use. I'd recharge the battery just before using it again. For other battery powered devices, such as wall clocks, flashlights, and TV remotes, disposable alkalines made more sense because rechargeables would run down more quickly from self-discharge than due to the power needed by the device.

       Eneloops are also suitable for long-running devices like this battery operated clock.
    Eneloops are also suitable for long-running devices like this battery operated clock.
    With the Eneloops still maintaining about half their capacity after a year, it's now feasible to use them in such long-term applications. When they do run down, I can just insert freshly charged ones and recharge the old ones. This has enormous potential environmental benefits, since it can virtually eliminate the need for disposable batteries.

    Because of their low internal resistance, Eneloops are also ideal for high-current devices. This is the battery pack for my Nikon Coolpix 8700 digital camera.   
    Because of their low internal resistance, Eneloops are also ideal for high-current devices. This is the battery pack for my Nikon Coolpix 8700 digital camera.
    Like regular NiMH AA batteries, Eneloops are also a great choice for high-current devices like digital cameras that like to eat batteries. I recently purchased a Nikon MB-E5700 external battery pack for my Coolpix 8700 camera. This attaches to the bottom of the camera and holds six AA cells. I put a freshly charged set of Eneloops in them before our trip to Florida. One and a half months and 160 photos later, the camera's battery indicator is still showing "full".

    [May 2007 Update: I finally had to recharge the Eneloops after three months and 320 pictures.]

    At this point, Eneloop technology is still relatively new. It remains to be seen how long they will last. Just because an Eneloop cell might last a year in a clock before needing recharging, and it can be recharged hundreds of times, doesn't mean it will last hundreds of years. All battery technologies wear out, even when their full capabilities are not being used. However, these are a form of NiMH technology, which is very reliable and stable. I have a 10 year old NiMH battery that can still achieve about 85% of its original capacity, so I have confidence in the Eneloops' longevity.

    Where to Buy Them

    Sanyo's Eneloop batteries are available from a number of North American retailers including Circuit City, Fry's Electronics, and the Ritz Camera Centers family of stores. They are also available on-line in the USA through Amazon.com:

    In Canada, Eneloops can be purchased on-line from BatteryBuyer.ca:

    For purchase in Europe, please refer to the Sanyo Component Europe web site.

     
    A Response from SANYO

    About a month after first posting this review, I received a very nice e-mail from Mr. Taetow, Vice President General Affairs at SANYO Component Europe GmbH, expressing appreciation for my independent review and addressing a few points, which I've summarized below:

    1. The Eneloop batteries are sold charged, but not necessarily 100% fully charged. In Europe we charge them about 75%. I am not sure to which degree they are charged before being sold in Canada. Thus it is rather vague to estimate the discharge rate by calculating backwards to the production date. Also, the storage conditions (transport, warehouse, shop, etc.) are unknown (see point 3 below).
    2. Several long term tests have shown that the self-discharge rate decreases over time. This means that Eneloop batteries discharge relatively fast at the beginning and relatively slower the longer you store them. To get real (long-term) test results, you have to store them and wait. An estimation of long-term discharge rate by extrapolating short term storage results is not correct and leads to rather poor results. This may explain the differences you have seen.
    3. Storage temperature is of high importance if you measure self-discharge rate. Higher temperatures substantially increase self-discharging. It is best to store Eneloops as cool as possible to keep the charge in the battery. As a rule-of-thumb, every 10°C increase in storage temperature is equivalent to doubling the storage time. Some R/C pilots in Europe put Eneloops in the freezer, with rather good results.

    In short, the Eneloops may be even better than my tests show. Without more testing, I can't confirm this, but my results show they are already far better than traditional NiMH rechargeables.

    Mr. Taetow also saw my home-made USB Powered AA Charger (which can be used for Eneloops) and informed me that Sanyo is introducing their own USB powered Eneloop charger, scheduled for release on May 21, 2007.

     
    May 2007: Comparison with Traditional NiMH Rechargeables

    Over the course of the last seven weeks, I repeated the above experiments with a set of 2500mAh NiMH cells of a well respected brand. After an initial set of four cycles, these had the following characteristics:

    MeasurementFour CellsOne Cell
    Measured Capacity @ 1.2 A2172 mAh
    Total Energy @ 1.2 A9745 mWh2436 mWh
    Average Voltage Under Load4.49 V1.12 V
    Internal DC Resistance0.430 Ω0.108 Ω
    Characteristics of a 4-pack of AA traditional 2500mAh
    NiMH cells after four discharge/charge cycles, prior
    to a seven week rest.

    Seven weeks later (less two days), I performed a discharge test and achieved the following results:

    MeasurementFour CellsOne Cell
    Measured Capacity @ 1.2 A1360 mAh
    Total Energy @ 1.2 A5647 mWh1412 mWh
    Average Voltage Under Load4.15 V1.04 V
    Internal DC Resistance0.499 Ω0.125 Ω
    Characteristics of a 4-pack of AA traditional 2500mAh
    NiMH cells after a seven week rest.

    This works out to a capacity retention of 62.6% (a loss of 37.4%) over the course of 47 days, which translates to the following results for differing time periods:

    Time PeriodCharge RetentionCharge Loss
    Day99.0%1.0%
    Week93.3%6.7%
    Month73.8%26.2%
    Six Months16.2%83.8%
    Year2.6%97.4%
    Charge retention and loss characteristics of
    traditional 2500mAh AA NiMH cells for various periods.
    (Six month and one year values are predictions.)

    Although these cells start out with about 20% more capacity than the Eneloops, they lose their capacity more quickly. After only three weeks of storage, the Eneloops have more capacity remaining. After about 3½ months, the Eneloops will have twice the capacity of the traditional cells.

    After only three weeks of storage, traditional 2500mAh NiMH cells will have less capacity remaining than 2000mAh Eneloops.
    After only three weeks of storage, traditional 2500mAh NiMH cells will have less capacity remaining than 2000mAh Eneloops.

    [September 2007 Update: My recent experience purchasing eleven month old Eneloops that had the same initial charge (72% of rated capacity) as six month old ones (74%) suggests that the the Eneloops' self-discharge curve flattens out. The above graph should probably look approximately like this:

    Revised graph based on experience with eleven month old Eneloops. Even better than previously thought!
    Revised graph based on experience with eleven month old Eneloops. Even better than previously thought!

    ]

    Other Articles of Interest

    If you found this article useful, you may also be interested in:


     

     
    Buy Stefan a coffee! If you've found this article
    useful, consider leaving a donation to help support
    stefanv.com

     
    Last updated Saturday August 22, 2009. E-mail Stefan

     

    Disclaimer: Although every effort has been made to ensure accuracy and reliability, the information on this web page is presented without warranty of any kind, and Stefan Vorkoetter assumes no liability for direct or consequential damages caused by its use. It is up to you, the reader, to determine the suitability of, and assume responsibility for, the use of this information.

    Copyright: All materials on this web site, including the text, images, and HTML mark-up, are Copyright © 2009 by Stefan Vorkoetter unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Unauthorized duplication prohibited. You may link to this site or pages within it, but you may not link directly to images on this site, and you may not copy any material from this site to another web site or other publication without express written permission. You may make copies for your own personal use.