Review: Pre-Charged (Low Self-Discharge) Rechargeable Battery Comparison
|
|
|
|
Three popular brands of pre-charged (low self-discharge) rechargeable NiMH AA batteries.
|
It's been about two years since I first published my
review of Sanyo's Eneloop low self-discharge
rechargeable batteries. Since that time, other manufacturers have jumped on
the bandwagon, and comparable batteries are now available under many different
brand names. This review compares the performance of several of these batteries
(including Sanyo's).
What Is "Low Self-Discharge"?
Sanyo first introduced low self-discharge technology in 2006 in response to a
shortcoming of normal NiMH rechargeable batteries, namely that they suffer from
a very high self-discharge rate. In plain English, this means that the battery
will run down in a matter of weeks or months even when it's just sitting there
in the package or a switched-off device. This characteristic restricted NiMH
batteries to applications where high currents are needed for a relatively short
period of time, such as digital cameras.
With the introduction of the Sanyo's Eneloop battery, NiMH batteries could be
used in devices that were traditionally restricted to disposable alkaline
batteries, such as wall clocks and TV remote controls. And, when used in
gadgets like digital cameras or flashlights, they can be left installed for
weeks or months on end and will still work when you pick up the camera for that
spontaneous snapshot or reach for the flashlight during a power failure.
A happy side-effect of low-self discharge is that the manufacturer can
pre-charge the batteries before they leave the factory and they will still be
charged when you buy them many months later. This is great, but in my opinion,
the battery manufacturers' marketing departments over-emphasize this on the
packaging (marking them "pre-charged") while glossing over the underlying low
self-discharge characteristics that make these batteries pre-chargeable, and
more importantly, so much more useful than ordinary rechargeables.
Comparison Methodology
This review compares the tested batteries in four different scenarios:
- Fresh out of the package.
- Immediately after being recharged.
- One week after being recharged.
- Seven weeks after being recharged.
In each scenario, we'll look at the total capacity provided in milliAmp-hours
(mAh), total energy provided in milliWatt-hours (mWh), and average voltage
under load (V). In the one-week and seven-week tests, we'll also look at the
charge retention (remaining capacity as a percentage of just-recharged
capacity). The brands being compared are (in alphabetical order):
- Duracell Rechargeable Pre-charged
- EasyPix Pre-charged Rechargeable
- Panasonic R2 Technology Rechargeable
- Powerex Imedion
- President's Choice Rechargeable
- Rayovac Hybrid
- Sanyo Eneloop
- Sony CycleEnergy
As I get my hands on other brands, I will test those too and update this
article with the new information. (If you are a manufacturer or distributor of
low self-discharge AA batteries and want to see yours in this review,
please contact me to arrange to have
them tested.)
All the tests were done using my BattMan II
Computer Controlled Battery Manager. Discharging was done at 1200mA, which
is on the high end of what these batteries would be expected to deliver in an
application such as a digital camera. Charging was also done at 1200mA, using
the −ΔV peak-detection method. The charging graphs were inspected
manually to ensure no false peaks occured. The initial recharge (after the
fresh-out-of-the-package test) was repeated until the capacity stopped
increasing.
The Results
The table below contains all the results for the batteries I've tested so far
(here
is a large-font version). The batteries were tested in groups of four
cells, but the results are for an individual cell (i.e. one AA "battery").
Additional comments appear after the table.
| |
Duracell(5) Rechargeable Pre-charged |
E8ge 1000 Ready to Use Rechargeable |
EasyPix Pre-charged Rechargeable |
Panasonic R2 Technology Rechargeable |
Powerex Imedion |
President's Choice Rechargeable |
Rayovac Hybrid |
Sanyo(4) Eneloop |
Sony CycleEnergy |
| Made in... |
Japan |
China |
China |
China |
Taiwan |
Japan |
China |
Japan |
Japan |
| Fresh Out of the Package(1) |
Capacity(2) (mAh) |
1383 |
1708 |
1443 |
682 |
1573 |
1387 |
1489 |
1439 |
1377 |
Energy (mWh) |
1509 |
1818 |
1565 |
719 |
1697 |
1502 |
1557 |
1588 |
1500 |
Voltage(3) (V) |
1.09 |
1.06 |
1.08 |
1.05 |
1.08 |
1.08 |
1.05 |
1.10 |
1.09 |
| Immediately after Recharging |
Capacity (mAh) |
1888 |
1967 |
2019 |
1781 |
2014 |
1871 |
1962 |
1928 |
1874 |
Energy (mWh) |
2181 |
2183 |
2268 |
2037 |
2240 |
2131 |
2216 |
2217 |
2167 |
Voltage (V) |
1.15 |
1.11 |
1.12 |
1.14 |
1.11 |
1.14 |
1.13 |
1.15 |
1.16 |
| One Week after Recharging |
Capacity (mAh) |
1770 |
1807 |
1880 |
1667 |
1881 |
1771 |
1772 |
1796 |
1757 |
Retention (%) |
93.8 |
91.8 |
93.1 |
93.6 |
93.4 |
94.7 |
90.3 |
93.2 |
93.8 |
Energy (mWh) |
1946 |
1973 |
2071 |
1795 |
2056 |
1949 |
1905 |
1979 |
1964 |
Voltage (V) |
1.10 |
1.09 |
1.10 |
1.08 |
1.09 |
1.10 |
1.08 |
1.10 |
1.12 |
| Seven Weeks after Recharging |
Capacity (mAh) |
1729 |
Coming 2010-Feb-06 |
1780 |
1581 |
1803 |
1718 |
1677 |
1763 |
1711 |
Retention (%) |
91.6 |
88.2 |
88.8 |
89.5 |
91.8 |
85.5 |
91.4 |
91.3 |
Energy (mWh) |
1871 |
1922 |
1686 |
1931 |
1891 |
1780 |
1943 |
1876 |
Voltage (V) |
1.08 |
1.08 |
1.07 |
1.07 |
1.10 |
1.06 |
1.10 |
1.10 |
Notes
-
Out-of-the-box capacity is provided for interest's sake only. It is not
a very useful measure because it really depends on how long the batteries sat
on the shelf before you bought them, and the conditions under which they were
shipped and stored.
-
The capacity was measured at a 1200mA discharge rate, which is about three
times the current at which the manufacturers measure the capacity. As a result,
all of these batteries test lower than the advertised capacity. However, the
results are more realistic for high-current applications like digital cameras.
-
This is the average voltage that the battery provided during a full discharge
at 1200mA. This is not the same voltage you would see if you just measured it
with a multimeter, but it is typical of the instantaneous voltage a digital
camera might see while snapping a picture.
-
The results reported in this chart for Sanyo's Eneloop batteries are not
identical to those in my original 2007
Eneloop review because I have tested a new set for this comparison,
using the same new BattMan II battery analyzer that all the other brands
were tested with. The differences are due to the normal variation among
batteries of the same brand, and differences in the equipment used.
-
The Duracell Rechargeable Pre-charged batteries that I tested were
the ones with a white ring around the positive terminal. Since then,
Duracell has switched to batteries made in China. These can be distinguished
by a black ring around the positive terminal. I have not tested those, but
reports from others suggest that their performance is more like that of
the Rayovac Hybrid batteries.
Analysis
As mentioned in the notes above, the out-of-the-package capacity is really not
a very meaningful measure because it depends on too many things besides the
battery itself. However, for what it's worth, the Powerex Imedion
battery had the highest pre-charged capacity and the Panasonic R2 had
the lowest, delivering only 1/3 of the rated capacity. The Rayovac
Hybrid batteries and the Panasonics had the lowest voltage under load,
at only 1.05V, meaning that many digital cameras would consider them "dead"
fresh out of the package.
Immediately after recharging, the batteries with the highest capacity were the
EasyPix and Powerex offerings, although all the brands provided an acceptable
capacity. The lowest voltage, only 1.11V, was provided by the Powerex
batteries, with the highest coming from the the Sony CycleEnergy brand,
followed closely by Sanyo's Eneloop and Duracell's Rechargeable
Pre-charged.
A week after recharging, things evened out somewhat, with all the capacities
falling into a fairly narrow range. Those batteries that exhibited the
highest freshly-charged capacity generally dropped the most, the most
significant example being the Rayovacs, which retained only 90.3% of their
capacity. The President's Choice Rechargeables on the other hand
retained 94.7%. The range of voltages was also quite narrow, with a low of
1.08V for the Panasonic and Rayovac models and a high of 1.12V for Sony.
After seven weeks, the performance started to spread out again. A real
distinction began to emerge between the Chinese-made batteries and those
from Japan. The former retained between 85.5% and 88.8% of their capacity
while the latter ranged from 91.3% to 91.8% (a very narrow range). The
made-in-Taiwan Powerex Imedion was in the middle, with 89.5% retained
capacity. In terms of absolute retained capacity (instead of percentage)
though, Powerex came out on top.
The range of voltages also spread out after seven weeks, with a very low 1.06V
from the Rayovacs and a respectable 1.10V from Sanyo, Sony, and President's
Choice. Voltage under load can be critical in devices which show a
low-battery warning at 1.1V and consider a battery to be "dead" when it drops
down to 1.0V. These higher voltage brands will far outlast the others in those
applications.
Physically, the Duracell, Sanyo, Sony, and President's Choice batteries look
identical (ignoring the artwork on the sleeve of course). They are also all
made in Japan. The Rayovac and Panasonic batteries (from China) look and
perform similarly to one another but quite differently from the Japanese
brands. Likewise, the Powerex (Taiwan) and Easypix (China) batteries are
similar to each other in appearance and performance, and different from the
others. My theory is that these eight brands of batteries are made by only
three different manufacturers.
Which brand to choose is a matter of what you are using them for. If a really
long life at low currents is important (e.g. as a clock battery), a brand with
a high retention percentage in the seven-week test is the best choice. Those
will hold their charge the longest, regardless of the initial capacity. If you
will be using them over a relatively short period such as a few months in
higher current applications (e.g. a digital camera you keep in your pocket or
purse), choose one with a high capacity and voltage in the seven-week test.
Recommendations
To choose the best low self-discharge battery for your application, you have to
know something about that application. If your device has a relatively high
voltage (above 1.0V) at which it considers the battery to be dead, choose a
brand with a high voltage under load. The Sanyos came out tops in the tests but
the Sony and Duracell offerings were right up there with them. In selecting
between these three, you may well decide based on other factors such as price,
the fact that Sony uses the least amount of packaging material, or that Sanyo
includes a reusable battery storage case.
If you're interested in shorter term capacity, the Rayovacs do well right after
being charged but quickly fall behind. They also have the lowest voltage under
load, which may make their apparent capacity in some gadgets even lower. On the
other hand, they can often be found locally at lower prices than the other
brands.
What I did not test is how well these batteries will hold up after being
recharged hundreds of times over the course of many years, and there's really
no way to know this without waiting those years to find out. The only data
point I have in that regard is that the Sanyo Eneloop batteries that
I've been using in my Nikon camera for two years are still going strong,
averaging 300 or more photos and three months between recharges.
Other Articles of Interest
For more information on NiMH rechargeable batteries and devices to charge them,
you may be interested in the following articles:
|
Buy Stefan a coffee!
If you've found this article
useful, consider
leaving a donation
to help support
stefanv.com
|
|
|
Disclaimer:
Although every effort has been made to ensure accuracy and
reliability, the information on this web page is presented without
warranty of any kind, and Stefan Vorkoetter assumes no liability for direct or
consequential damages caused by its use.
It is up to you, the reader, to determine the suitability of, and
assume responsibility for, the use of this information.
Copyright:
All materials on this web site, including the text, images, and HTML
mark-up, are Copyright © 2010 by Stefan Vorkoetter unless
otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Unauthorized duplication
prohibited. You may link to this site or pages within it, but
you may not link directly to images on this site, and you may
not copy any material from this site to another web site or
other publication without express written permission. You may make
copies for your own personal use.
|
|