|
Display your message here, where readers interested in
aviation
will see it. Send an e-mail to
ads@stefanv.com
for details and rates.
|

Subscribe
Recommend
|
|
|
This article by Stefan Vorkoetter originally appeared in the
April 2004 issue of
QuietFlyer
magazine and is reproduced here with permission.
|
|
|
|
Full-Scale Electric Powered Airplanes
Full scale electric powered aircraft? Yes!
I am writing this on December 17th 2003, one hundred years after the Wright
brothers first flew their Flyer with a home-made 12 horsepower
gasoline engine. Ever since that day, full-scale aircraft have been powered
by gasoline, kerosene, or rocket fuel, all of which produce a significant
amount of pollution and a lot of noise. QuietFlyer readers don't like
pollution and noise, which is why we fly sailplane and/or electric models.
|
|
|
|
The Silent-AE1 takes flight. At altitude, the motor is stopped, and the propeller pylon retracts into the fuselage. Photo courtesy of Alisport.
|
Now, there are a number of full-scale electric powered aircraft projects,
either completed or underway. We'll look at two of them, and compare each to
a representative model.
The Silent-AE1
In the early days of electric model aircraft, one of the most common uses
for electric power was in sailplanes. Battery capacities were low, so an
application in which power was needed for only a small part of the flight
made sense. It is not surprising then that the first commercially available
full-scale electric aircraft is also a sailplane, the Silent-AE1.
The AE1 is part of the Silent family of sailplanes
manufactured by the Alisport company of Italy. The family includes the
Silent, the engine-equipped Silent-IN, and the electric
Silent-AE1. The following table compares the three models:
|
|
Silent
|
Silent-IN
|
Silent-AE1
|
|
Wing Span
|
12 m / 39.4 ft
|
12 m / 39.4 ft
|
12 m / 39.4 ft
|
|
Wing Area
|
10.3 sq.m / 111 sq.ft
|
10.3 sq.m / 111 sq.ft
|
10.3 sq.m / 111 sq.ft
|
|
Maximum Weight
|
240 kg / 530 lb
|
290 kg / 640 lb
|
300 kg / 660 lb
|
|
Power
|
n/a
|
21 kW / 28 hp
|
13 kW / 17.4 hp
|
|
Power-to-Weight
|
n/a
|
39 W/lb
|
20 W/lb
|
|
Maximum
Climb
|
n/a
|
500 ft/min
|
400 ft/min
|
|
Minimum
Sink
|
126 ft/min
|
138 ft/min
|
154 ft/min
|
|
|
|
Front view of the Silent-AE1. Photo courtesy of Alisport.
|
Both the Silent-IN and the Silent-AE1 have the propeller on
the end of a pylon that is hinged just behind the cockpit, and retracts
backwards into the fuselage for gliding flight. The propeller folds, but
unlike a model folding propeller, the blades fold downward instead of
backward.
Like a model electric sailplane, full-power duration is short, at about 5
minutes. This is enough power for one climb to about 2,000 feet. In good
thermalling conditions, that is high enough for a competent sailplane pilot
to find some lift and have a nice long flight. Even with no lift, 18 minute
flights are possible.
The AE1 uses a Nickel-Cadmium (NiCd) battery consisting of 12
parallel packs of 60 cells each (for a total of 720 cells), producing 72V
with a capacity of approximately 20 Ah. Doing a bit of arithmetic, one
arrives at a per-cell capacity of 1.7 Ah. The battery weighs 88 lbs, which
gives a weight just under 2 oz per cell (including interconnections), which
suggests that 1700SCR cells are being used.
|
|
|
|
Close-up of the base of the propeller pylon. The cogged drive belt is clearly visible, as are the tips of the folded propeller blades. Photo courtesy of Alisport.
|
The maximum motor power input is 16 kW at 72 V, giving a current of 220 A,
or 18 A per 60-cell pack. It appears that it may be possible to substitute
more modern cells, such as 2.4 Ah NiCd or 3.3 Ah NiMH SubC cells, which
could double the available motor run-time with little or no weight increase.
The use of Lithium Polymer cells could more than double the capacity again,
although that would cost a large fortune (as opposed to a small fortune for
the NiCd or NiMH option).
An Equivalent Model Sailplane
I've chosen a Great Planes Spectra model to compare with the
Silent AE1. A Spectra typically weighs about 3 lb, which makes it
approximately 1/6 scale (using the cube-root weight rule of scaling). This
corresponds exactly to the ratio of wingspans (2m for the Spectra
versus 12m for the AE1), confirming the choice of 1/6 as the scale
factor.
Another rule of scaling models (see my column,
Scale Electric Design, in the
October 2002 issue) is that the power-to-weight ratio remains about the same.
This means that our 3 lb Spectra should have approximately 60W of power
to have performance comparable to the AE1's. That translates into a
7-cell battery and a Speed 400 6V motor, which is much less power than even the
stock power system provided by Great Planes.
The AE1 uses a 76 inch propeller, which corresponds to about a 12
inch propeller for a 1/6 scale model. This means we'd need to use about a
4:1 gear ratio, and a 12x10 or so propeller, which would fly the
Spectra about as well as the supplied direct-drive Goldfire motor and
8x4 propeller on six cells.
This is not generally considered to be much power, but keep in mind that
most model aircraft, including electrics, are overpowered compared to their
full-scale counterparts.
|
|
|
The E-Plane on the apron, with the cowling removed. Photo by M. Zborowski.
|
The E-Plane
The non-profit Foundation for Advancing Science and Technology and Education
(FASTec) is backing the development of the E-Plane, an electric
powered full-scale airplane. It is being built by James Dunn and Advanced
Technology Products (ATP). Rather than starting from scratch, ATP began with
a commercially available aircraft, the French DynAero Lafayette III,
built by American Ghiles Aviation (AGA).
The Lafayette is a modern two-seat carbon-fiber aircraft, normally
powered by an 80 horsepower Rotax 912 engine. The airframe is very low in
drag compared to more traditional two-seaters like the Cessna 152.
The Lafayette can cruise at about 140 knots (160 mph or 258 km/h),
whereas the 152, equipped with a 110 hp Lycoming engine, cruises at
only 95 knots (110 mph or 176 km/h). For the E-Plane project, AGA
constructed a custom Lafayette with battery compartments in the wing,
no engine, and no fuel tanks.
This table compares the combustion and electric-powered Lafayette:
|
|
Lafayette Rotax 912
|
Lafayette E-Plane
|
|
Wing Span
|
8.64 m / 28.3 ft
|
8.64 m / 28.3 ft
|
|
Wing
Area
|
7.8 sq.m / 84 sq.ft
|
7.8 sq.m / 84 sq.ft
|
|
Maximum Weight
|
480 kg / 1050 lb
|
480 kg / 1050 lb
|
|
Power
|
60 kW / 80 hp
|
53 kW / 71 hp
|
|
Power-to-Weight
|
57 W/lb
|
50 W/lb
|
|
Maximum
Climb
|
2,000 ft/min
|
unknown
|
|
|
|
|
A close-up of the motor compartment. The motor is on the left, and the fuel cells are just visible on the right. The speed control will be installed above the fuel cells. Photo by B. Miller.
|
At the time of this writing, the rate of climb for the E-Plane was
not yet known. The plane has undergone taxi tests using a 270V Nickel
Metal-Hydride (NiMH) battery with approximately 18 Ah capacity. Hopefully,
the E-Plane will have flown successfully by the time you read this.
The development plan calls for initial flight tests to be done with a
Lithium-Ion battery of significantly higher capacity, giving the airplane a
range of approximately 100 miles. The final power source is to be a hydrogen
fuel cell combined with a Lithium-Ion battery. The fuel cell will provide
continuous power to give a 500 mile flying range (comparable to that of most
combustion powered light aircraft). The Lithium-Ion battery will act as a
buffer battery for short term bursts of full power, such as would be used
during take-off and initial climb-out.
|
|
|
For comparison, this photo shows the Rotax 912 80hp engine installation. Photo by B. Miller.
|
The motor used in the E-Plane is the EV218 brushless motor from UQM
Technologies Corp., which is basically a very large version of the brushless
motors many of us now use in model aircraft. Full throttle current is about
250A, and the speed control can handle 400A. The motor is optimized for high
torque at low rpm, eliminating the need for a gearbox. The motor and speed
control have a combined efficiency of about 92%.
The propeller is a 68 inch, in-flight electrically-adjustable variable pitch
three-bladed propeller made by Airmaster. By changing the pitch, the
propeller can be optimized to minimize the power requirements during both
climb and cruise.
The big "if" in the E-Plane project is the availability of
a fuel cell. This is currently a hot research topic, and if a powerful and
affordable fuel cell could be developed, it would revolutionize
transportation. Electric cars would be much more practical than they are
now, and an electric plane such as the E-Plane would have enough
range to be useful.
|
|
|
|
This is the 400A speed control used in the E-Plane. In addition to the connectors for the motor power leads, there is a plug for the Hall sensors, another to interface to the throttle control in the cockpit, and an inlet and outlet for liquid coolant. Photo by B. Miller.
|
Unlike a battery powered plane or car, a fuel cell powered vehicle is not
charged electrically, but is filled with hydrogen fuel. But, instead of
burning that fuel in an engine (which is also a possibility), it reacts with
oxygen in the presence of a catalyst, producing electricity and water. The
catalyst, unfortunately, contains platinum, which is one of the most
expensive substances known to man, hence the high cost of fuel cells.
An Equivalent Model Plane
First, from reading Table 2, it's obvious that the E-Plane's
power-to-weight ratio of 50 W/lb is within the range of normal for a
reasonably well performing electric model. If we were to build a 1/6 scale
model, it should weigh just under 5 lb, and require 250 W of power. A 10- to
12-cell battery pack and a suitable brushless motor would be ideal, and
would result in a model having similar performance to a battery-powered
full-scale E-Plane. A possible power system would consist of a
10xCP2400SCR battery, Jeti Phasor 45-3 brushless motor, and an 11x7
propeller (which is approximately to scale).
Perhaps someday, fuel cell technology will trickle down to us modelers, and
we will be able to get rid of our heavy field charging batteries in exchange
for a small cylinder of hydrogen from which to refuel. Just as fuel cells
will make electric cars as practical as gasoline powered ones, fuel cells
could make electric model aircraft be equal to glow models in every aspect
(although they are already close enough for most practical purposes).
Contrasts
The Silent-AE1 and the E-Plane are two very different
full-scale electric aircraft.
The Silent, like an electric model sailplane, only uses power to
achieve a launch. As with any motorglider, a benefit to the pilot is that
she need depend on a tow plane and its pilot, or a winch and its operator.
An additional benefit, brought on by the use of electric power, is that the
aircraft is quiet, allowing it to be launched even in places where noise
regulations prohibit other powered aircraft (like tow planes or combustion
powered motorgliders). This is a big concern in the Silent's home of
Italy, and in other European countries.
What I find most interesting about the Silent is that it's power
system is relatively low-tech. The motor is an off-the-shelf DC motor, and
the battery is constructed from readily available NiCd cells (albeit, a
large number of them). The power system is basically a scaled up version of
what we have been using in the hobby for years, and is not terribly
expensive.
The E-Plane on the other hand is attempting to achieve with electric
power that which has been the domain of gasoline piston engines for decades:
extended cruising flight in a personal aircraft. Such a plane could
be built using inexpensive off-the-shelf components, and it would fly, but
range and duration would barely be adequate to complete a single circuit of
the airfield.
Instead, the E-Plane is relying on the latest technology, some of
which is still immature. It uses a state-of-the-art brushless motor and
controller. Until the fuel cells become available, power for flight is being
supplied by a Lithium Ion battery, giving sufficient duration for at least
some meaningful test flights. A variable-pitch propeller squeezes the most
out of the power system (waste not, want not). The drawback of all this
high-tech equipment is cost. The motor alone costs $15,000 at the time of
this writing, and the cost of experimental fuel cells is still prohibitive.
However, once this technology becomes commonplace, prices should drop
dramatically.
More Information
You can find more detailed information about these full-scale electric
aircraft on the web. The Silent is described on Alisport's site at
www.alisport.com.
The E-Plane had its own web page at
www.aviationtomorrow.com,
although this now appears to be defunct. It was also covered in a series of
three articles in
Kitplanes magazine.
|
|
|
|
Buy Stefan a coffee!
If you've found this article
useful, consider leaving a donation
to help support
Stefan's General Aviation Web Site.
|
|
|
|
|
Last updated Saturday May 20, 2006.
|
E-mail Stefan
|
|
|
|
Disclaimer:
Although every effort has been made to ensure accuracy and
reliability, the information on this web page is presented without
warranty of any kind, and Stefan Vorkoetter assumes no liability for direct or
consequential damages caused by its use.
I am not a flight instructor, aircraft designer, or aircraft mechanic,
nor any other professional in this field. I am merely using this site
as a medium for sharing my experiences and the things I've learned.
It is up to you, the reader, to determine the suitability of, and
assume responsibility for, the use of this information.
Copyright:
All materials on this web site, including the text, images, and HTML
mark-up, are Copyright © 2008 by Stefan Vorkoetter unless
otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Unauthorized duplication
prohibited. You may link to this site or pages within it, but
you may not link directly to images on this site, and you may
not copy any material from this site to another web site or
other publication without express written permission. You may make
copies for your own personal use.
The text and images of this article are Copyright © 2004 by
Kiona Publishing, and are reproduced here with permission. All rights
reserved.
|
|